The Nature of Free Will, Part I
In the two hundred year era that began with Isaac Newton's scientific
works and ended with the discovery of quantum physics, Newtonian
physics (or "classical" physics) reigned supreme. And the
foundation of Newtonian physics rests upon Newton's first law of
motion: "Every body perseveres in its state of rest, or of
uniform motion in a right line, unless it is compelled to change that
state by forces impressed upon it." In other words, every
physical event has a physical cause.
Most of us have heard Newton's laws many times, and we intuitively
believe them. But the deep thinkers of the classical era realized
that there was an interesting implication of the first law: If every
event is generated as a result of an antecedent event, then the
universe and everything in it follows a fixed track of causality.
There is no happenstance or coincidence or free will; every event
simply leads directly to the next event, for all time.
The perception of a deterministic universe was nicely stated by the
French mathematician Pierre Simon Laplace:
An intellect which at a given instant knew all the forces acting in
nature, and the position of all things of which the world consists --
supposing the said intellect were vast enough to subject these data
to analysis -- would embrace in the same formula the motions of the
greatest bodies in the universe and those of the slightest atoms;
nothing would be uncertain for it, and the future, like the past,
would be present to its eyes.
The concept of determinism was explored by Tolstoy in
War and Peace,
and by Mark Twain in
The Mysterious Stranger and in his philosophical
essay, "What is Man?"
In short, everyone who cared to think about it realized that we are
all puppets on strings. God set the universe in motion, and then sat
back and to watch it play itself out.
Then along came quantum mechanics. And things really started to get
screwy.
The essential mystery of quantum mechanics is that, when you examine
matter and energy on a sub-atomic scale, you find a breakdown of
causality. The activity of a quantum particle defies analysis in
other than probabilistic terms. Consider the example of an electron
that moves from point A to point B following one of two possible
paths. Although the electron must "choose" only one of the
paths, the "footprint" shows conflicting evidence as to
which path was taken. Physicists at this point throw up their hands
and tell us that there is no meaningful statement to describe the
travel of the electron, other than to say it ended up at point B.
This is not to say that one path was taken but we can't know which.
The truth is that both paths were taken and neither path was taken.
Or perhaps it should simply be said that the path of the electron was not
resolved in the physical universe.
The science establishment at first could not accept the lack of
causality in the quantum world. Many believed that a cause-effect
deterministic relationship would eventually discovered. When Albert
Einstein said, "God does not play dice with the universe,"
he was expressing his disbelief in causeless events. It is now
generally accepted that Einstein was wrong, and that quantum events
do happen without specific cause or form.
Thus does the new science rescue us from the fate to which the old
science had consigned us to. We are not puppets on a string, our
destinies determined from the beginning of time. Quantum physics
precludes determinism, and thus allows us the potential of true free
will.
Or does it? Cause-and-effect continues to apply on the macrocosmic
(non-quantum) level. Our practical analysis of the day-to-day world
is based upon our assumptions of causality. Who cares if the
underlying reality is unstable? Our personalities are formed by big
events, not by sub-atomic interactions. So it's not clear how we are
saved from our deterministic fate based upon a non-deterministic
quantum world.
Nevertheless, it is interesting to contemplate how the quantum
reality allows for the manipulation of physical events in our
universe by Something Else. What is free will? An illusion we
experience as we move along on our tracks? Or a quantum effect?
This question is left as an exercise to the reader.